Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Donald McKinley Allen's column >>

DONALD MCKINLEY ALLEN

Freelance author with eyes focused on America's future
Articles Posted: 165  Links Seeded: 0
Member Since: 11/2010  Last Seen: 2/16/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Red Meat Republicans

Tue Jan 24, 2012 6:22 AM EST
politics, gop, gingrich, red-meat, ronmey
By Donald McKinley Allen
Advertise | AdChoices

Will Willard Mitt Romney actually fulfill the Republican tradition of nominating the next man in line for a run at the Presidency? Probably. Will Romney ever have the full hearted support of the rightest wing of the Republican Party? Probably not. It’s been pretty clear from the get-go that a whole bunch of the GOP members have wanted “anyone but Romney”. Most of the evangelical Christian Right and much of the TEA Party have been willingly, nay eagerly, throwing their support behind one candidate after another as long as they were not Romney. Maybe it is the “Mormon” thing. Maybe it is the “wooden” thing. Maybe it is even the “central casting” look. It is probably all of the above and some other things too. 

But I think the key “thing” is something that the Party members find missing in Romney; the red meat- go for the jugular thing. Romney shows no real tendency or inclination to go for the most visceral approach to attacking his opponents. He will challenge any of his opponents within the Party as being too much of a Washington insider or professional politician versus his short term, almost amateur career in politics. He will say that his private business experience makes him more suited to take on the job of top professional political insider than those who have spent a lifetime developing their skills in Washington. But he does so in an almost teasing rather than attacking fashion. Even when he goes after President Obama; Romney is more likely to call him a European style big government socialist type then condemn him as the “food stamp President”. Romney rarely tosses out gratuitous red meat to the crowd and never goes for the jugular. 

But all the other “not Romney” candidates have and do. And that is what a big chunk of the Rep Party members seem to want, nay crave. Before the primaries even started it was Sarah Palin spouting the standard right wing anti-big government harangues that the broad base of the GOP just loved to hear. Then it was Donald The Trump who popped to the fore with his birther based bid to gin up the crowds. Then there was Michelle Bachman with her one-trick-pony act of; “I’ll fight Obamacare”, which she repeated over and over, no matter what the issue; without telling anyone exactly why she was against health care being made more accessible. After her came Rick “the Hair” Perry making a lot of cowboy wind about how he was going to shut down three cabinet departments; if he could have remembered which ones he had in mind. Then there was Herman Cain with his famous “if you aren’t rich, it’s your own fault” line that reinforces the kind of libertarian unwillingness to be generous to those viewed to be undeserving as put forward by Ron Paul. Rick Santorum got to near the top by mouthing 1980’s conservative Christian lines about taking away women’s reproductive and health care choices and banning same sex marriage because his interpretation of his particular Christian Bible. Huntsman was the only one not considered for number the one spot; because he blended right into the walls and was too much like Romney. 

Absent the ability to throw out the red meat on subjects such as race, food stamps, welfare, Medicaid, Social Security and any other program for either the young, old or poor; Romney is never going to win the hearts and minds of about 2/3’s of the Republican base of voters. Even after he has almost won Iowa, triumphed in New Hampshire, and came in kind of close in South Carolina, the Reps are still looking for a stop Romney candidate. And they have seemed to find themselves one. Rising up from the down, out and dead, Newt Gingrich seems to have captured the hearts and minds and mostly the guts of all the parts of the Rep big tent that Romney can’t seem to get to warm up to him. 

The Main Stream of the GOP, a combination of well off Main Streeters and the very well off Wall Streeters, seem exceedingly content with Romney. They believe that he understands their fears and aspirations. He shares their (the 1%) fear of losing any more of their money to taxes and have it used it give the non-rich (the 99%) some economic assistance like; unemployment benefits, food banks for hungry children, shelters for those with nowhere to live. But compared to the real red meat candidates who are appealing to the working class and poor of the Republican mob; Romney’s economic package it considerably less Draconian. He only wants to maintain the excessive economic advantages that the rich already have. The Red Meaters want to extend and expand the give-aways to the rich, including eliminating their taxes entirely; while sharply decreasing the volume and kind of services provided to the not-so-rich, including eliminating some of them entirely. The Red Meat plans will not help the vast majority of Republicans, in fact it will have a significant negative impact on many of them. But despite that, they believe that taking from those who they believe to be the undeserving poor and giving to the even less deserving rich, will help them. Because that’s what the throwers of Red Meat say to them. And because that’s what they want to hear; that’s what they falsely believe will happen. They believe these promises of an improvement in their economic lives, like they have believed the promise of banning abortion for the last 30 years; even though the GOP never makes it happen. 

So Romney finds himself in a stiff uphill battle against the ultra-right promises, to capture the prize he and his backers thinks he deserves. Fortunately he and his backers have suitcases full of money. And money is the critical, essential, indispensible thing needed to, if not win hearts and minds, to win votes of the GOP rank and file. Thanks to the Citizens United decision, the very wealthy have no limits on their ability to use their wealth to try and pick and elect a Republican nominee who will do everything in his considerable power, should he win the Presidency, to  make sure they are repaid for their investment in him, many times over. At least that’s what the men behind the curtain hope. The traditional big business board of directors which run the GOP also believe that a real Red Meater, might be more popular than Romney; but has a much lesser chance of actually of beating Obama. So while the T’s and Evangelicals who like to hear their nominee call Obama everything but a Democrat; the real power (money) in the Republican Party want someone who has the best chance of representing them in Washington, and that person is not a Red Meater.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Donald McKinley Allen's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (14)
Mary-471639

Excellent article.

For all the different personas that Mitt has created to appeal to a fractured party, not even he can be radical enough for them.

Pumping up a base on steroids against ACA (ObamaCare) makes it very difficult to repackage Romney, whose health care bill in MA it was fashioned after. Their still in roid rage over it and Romney is just a reminder of it.

And the money brokers are perplexed the rank and file Republicans are not falling in line? If 2010 is any indicator, the establishment Republicans may be surprised again at being shunned by their own.

  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 7:17 AM EST
feliznavidad

Establishment republicans may be surprised again at being shunned by their own.

They, will be surprised, Mary, but they have been asking or it for years. The republican party is now run on "red meat" not on any kind of substance, policy, or even ability to govern (note the number of TGOP governors who after a year or two, find their ratings by the citizens in their states to be hovering around the 30% approval mark -- which represents hard-core republicans). Their crowds come out for red meat, and the TGOP party, for example, willingly let Sarah Palin, the vice presidential nominee, run for president by throwing out plenty of racist red meat. Hopefully, these hateful tactics cannot work in America for the long haul, because Americans tend to value fairness, equality under the law, and other inherently democratic values. We saw it reach a bizarre pinnacle in South Carolina where angry white men dramatically displayed their bile at the TGOP debates. So, ironically, the TGOP party sowed the seeds for their own destruction. The TGOP party is "dumbing down" it's own electorate. A dangerous game -- but fitting. What worries me, is that as they TGOP destroys public access to education, and also re-writes school history texts to reflect their distorted world view -- the line of resistance supported by the worthy American character may not yet hold.

  • 4 votes
#1.1 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:27 AM EST
Reply
sistagirl

Oh yea, we already have been seeing throughout the many anybody but Mitt candidates from the teapartiers/repubs that this is a fight. Who will win that battle.. established money vs teaparty anger? Just keep the popcorn popping, baby!!!

  • 4 votes
Reply#2 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 7:31 AM EST
MeanGene-3334839

What does Mitt Romney bring in votes? Not much. Sure, he's a Mormon, but Utah is in the bag for Republicans. Utah hasn't voted for a Democrat since Lyndon Johnson in 1964.

The money states for Republicans are Florida and Texas. California and New York are lost causes, they're ultra-liberal communes who are as good as in Obama's pocket so the Republicans have one shot and that's the Bible Belt... which no Mormon can win.

When we're talking about Florida and Texas, then we're talking about Baptists and Catholics, both of whom consider Mormonism a cult religion. Romney can't win those States, which means, essentially, that Romney can't win election. He's unelectable. Republicans have to take both Florida and Texas to have any hope of victory in the Presidential election. Romney can't do it.

The race to get a Republican elected is a long shot, easily 5:1 odds against it so the shot might as well be a crazy one. Obama has proven time and time again with his unyielding socialist plots like Obamacare and the blocking of the Keystone XL Pipeline that he will not negotiate.

All the Republicans have left is a Hail Mary play, and that would be Gingrich for President. If that happens, then Republicans win the game. Romney can't do a Hail Mary play, and he can't win the game.

  • 2 votes
Reply#3 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 7:34 AM EST
sistagirl

MeanGene....oh give it a rest with the socialist crap of Obamacare, it's so old. You know that no health insurance providers have been taken over by this government. That rhetoric may have worked during the HCR fight but we have seen better and we know the people that spewed that talking points rhetoric got paid plenty. Get current dude!! With people like you that just repeat it shows your ignorance. We know too that Romney is a reminder of the ACA cause it was based on his Massachuettes' plan and the teaparty/repubs don't like that. But if they would get over the talking points like you and Fox spew out and actually see the benefits, they may see things different; hell some of them may be benefiting now from Obama's ACA. Go on if you dare tea/repubs with the Hail Mary pass and put Gingrich out there as the nominee and see for sure that our current President is re-elected, yea baby!!!!

  • 5 votes
#3.1 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 7:55 AM EST
ryoushi12

Meangene just represents the typical republican who applauds and cheers for gingrich - with all that that implies.

  • 3 votes
#3.2 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:47 AM EST
Randy McMurphy

What does it mean when an american right winger calls universal healthcare, yet the freest most capitalist nations in the world, more so than us according to their rightwing belief tank heritage foundation( y'know the guys who conceived the individual mandate) ALL have universal state mandated healthcare? Everyone of them, Hong Kong, singapore, Australia, Switzerland, Ireland,Canada in fact ALL the most capitalist OECD? It is meaningless, they are a self licking ice cream cone...

  • 2 votes
#3.3 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:57 AM EST
MeanGene-3334839

MeanGene....oh give it a rest with the socialist crap of Obamacare, it's so old. You know that no health insurance providers have been taken over by this government.

Of course not, because Obama didn't have the courage of his convictions and pushed CommieCare back to 2014 so he wouldn't be facing re-election based on its complete and utter failure due to incompetence and rejection. It's like what he's doing with the Keystone XL pipeline, he's punting it until after his re-election bid because he's got no courage of his convictions and no leadership.

That rhetoric may have worked during the HCR fight but we have seen better and we know the people that spewed that talking points rhetoric got paid plenty. Get current dude!! With people like you that just repeat it shows your ignorance.

Nope, HCR isn't over. We've got a debt to settle with a whole lot of payback coming to the pinko commie bastards who forced this down our throats. Do not underestimate the hate and rage this HCR bill caused and never forget that payback is a bitch. We have not yet begun to fight against communism in the 21st Century. Damned pinkos are going to rue the day they ever tried to socialize medicine.

We know too that Romney is a reminder of the ACA cause it was based on his Massachuettes' plan and the teaparty/repubs don't like that. But if they would get over the talking points like you and Fox spew out and actually see the benefits, they may see things different; hell some of them may be benefiting now from Obama's ACA.

Romneycare is exactly why Mitt Romney won't carry the South or anywhere else that appreciates freedom and liberty. Nobody is benefitting from Obamacare. When Obamacare was passed, there were 43 Million Americans without health insurance. Now there are 52 Million Americans without health insurance, so nearly 10 Million people are SUFFERING because Obamacare passed. Every time a communist tries to solve a problem, he makes things worse. That's why communists need to be stopped every time they try to help. They'll always hurt instead because they're completely incompetent.

Go on if you dare tea/repubs with the Hail Mary pass and put Gingrich out there as the nominee and see for sure that our current President is re-elected, yea baby!!!!

Obama was a worthless pissant in his first term getting blocked by Republicans and Blue Dog Democrats, and he'd be even more worthless as a LAME DUCK PRESIDENT. He'll have no ability to cut deals, no ability to do the kind of baldfaced bribery he used to get Obamacare passed and if CommieBama is re-elected then he's going to have the same political pull as the night watchman at the White House gate.

Which is fine with me because I don't want the damned incompetent government to do anything to try and help. They've always made things worse, all the time, every time. They shouldn't even be allowed to try and help people. There should be a Constitutional Amendment forbidding government help.

"I'm From The Government And I'm Here To Help"... The nine scariest words according to Ronald Reagan.

  • 1 vote
#3.4 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 2:15 PM EST
feliznavidad

Gingrich supporters = the pro-bully segment. Not a winning strategy for the long haul. There are far more bullies in the Republican base than in society at large. Just look at the joy when Gingrich showed such disrespect for Juan Williams.

  • 1 vote
#3.5 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 2:20 PM EST
MeanGene-3334839

Gingrich supporters = the pro-bully segment. Not a winning strategy for the long haul. There are far more bullies in the Republican base than in society at large. Just look at the joy when Gingrich showed such disrespect for Juan Williams.

The strategy doesn't have to win for the long haul. It only has to work for one day, November 6th. No other day this year matters in the Presidential Election. You actually can fool all of the people some of the time.

  • 1 vote
#3.6 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 2:36 PM EST
sistagirl

MeanGene....I keep forgetting you are your name...mean. So there is no value in conversing with you.

    #3.7 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 6:54 PM EST
    MeanGene-3334839

    There's not much value in talking to liberals about whom the Democrats want to see get the Republican Nomination anyway because they want a LIBERAL REPUBLICAN.

    Do you know the REAL reason that Democrats would so dearly love to see Romney get nominated? It's because he's a NEW ENGLAND REPUBLICAN. Like Lincoln Chafee and Olympia Snowe, he's a total liberal who just happens to be a Republican.

    You have to realize what NEW ENGLAND REPUBLICANS have to be in order to win election in places like TAXACHUSSETTS. Romney got elected Governor in the same State that put the horror show Ted Kennedy in office for nearly 50 years. Massachusetts is an insanely ultraliberal State and only liberals (even ones calling themselves Republican) get elected on the Eastern Seaboard.

    Do you know what the difference between an Obama administration and a Romney administration would be? There wouldn't be any. We'd have Romneycare instead of Obamacare. We'd have a dumb city slicker taxaholic millionaire from Harvard Law School either way. There's no contrast between Romney and Obama.

    We need a candidate for the Republican Party who will end the Obama administration, not continue the destruction and be another dumbass 'food stamp president' like W. Bush was with his stupid "compassionate conservatism" which turned out to be warmed-over communism.

    • 1 vote
    #3.8 - Wed Jan 25, 2012 6:29 AM EST
    Reply
    baddestbob

    the problem with romney is that he has no set of consistent values. he is a human GPS. you pretty much know where is is by what he is saying. by trying to please everyone, romney pleases no one. gingrich on the other hand appears to be gaining popularity. but where is he gainig popularity? in south carolina? well gee, that's a state where no politician go go far enough to the right. newt may win florida where primaries are closed. with only republicans voting and most of them being those from the far right base, it would be a loss for newt if this race is close.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#4 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 8:10 AM EST
    feliznavidad

    Human GPS -- I'm gonna borrow that!

      Reply#5 - Tue Jan 24, 2012 12:49 PM EST
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
      (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
      Newsvine Privacy Statement
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      FUN STUFF:
      • Leaderboard |
      • E-Mail Alerts |
      • Top of the Vine |
      • Newsvine Live |
      • Newsvine Archives |
      • The Greenhouse |
      COMPANY STUFF:
      • Code of Honor |
      • Company Info |
      • Contact Us |
      • Jobs |
      • User Agreement |
      • Privacy Policy |
      • About our ads
      LEGAL STUFF:
      • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com